Planning Commission recommends denial of zoning changes for energy generation

The Eagle Mountain City Planning Commission held a meeting Tuesday night, centering on proposed zoning amendments that would enable new types of power generation facilities within city limits.

These amendments, which included provisions for natural gas power plants, battery energy storage systems and small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs), have sparked conversations among commissioners, City staff, residents, and industry representatives.

The commission ultimately voted 3-2 to recommend denial of the proposal to the City Council, which is scheduled to deliberate on the matter next Tuesday, Jan. 21.

By considering the proposal, Eagle Mountain City is attempting to address burgeoning energy needs spurred by rapid population growth and increased demand from data centers and industrial developments planned in the community. City staff emphasized the importance of planning for future power requirements to attract businesses and create jobs.

“We need to be ready with that power in some way, whether it’s with Rocky Mountain Power or other independent providers,” City Economic Development Director Evan Berrett said. “It’s about ensuring we don’t find ourselves wishing we had acted 15 years earlier.”

Staff highlighted the economic benefits of fostering local energy generation, including tax revenue and bolstered infrastructure, which could position Eagle Mountain as a hub for technological and industrial growth.

Some residents in attendance at Tuesday night’s meeting, however, expressed deep apprehension about the inclusion of SMRs in the proposed zoning changes. Fears ranged from safety issues, such as radioactive leaks and waste storage, to broader concerns about the impact on property values and the community’s reputation.

“Small modular reactors are scary for any type of population, especially right now,” said Joy Hiatt Rasmussen, during the public comment portion of the meeting.

Others echoed concerns about the longevity of waste storage solutions, potential transportation risks and whether the City would bear economic burdens from investing in unproven technologies. The City would not support the siting of energy generation projects near residences.

Some residents also questioned the motives behind the proposal.

“This seems more about tax revenue and expanding the city than prioritizing the safety of residents,” Rasmussen said.

The commissioners grappled with balancing the city’s future energy needs against perceived risks associated with SMRs and other proposed technologies. Some expressed frustration with the lack of clear alternatives to meet the city’s growing energy demands.

“If not nuclear, then what?” said Planning Commissioner Robert Fox. “Where should we go to get the electricity that we’re going to need sooner than 20 years from now?”

Others stressed the importance of leaving the door open to technological advancements while ensuring stringent reviews for any potential projects.

“We need to plan for energy needs today, but that doesn’t mean approving every option,” Alternate Planning Commissioner Bryan Free said.

Representatives from the energy sector provided insights into the evolving landscape of power generation. Philip Sandinu of Tract, a data center planning and development firm, emphasized that modern natural gas facilities have stringent regulations and produce minimal emissions.

“Natural gas was the bridge from coal to renewable energy,” Sandinu noted.

Adrien Bell from Holland & Hart, representing Enyo Energy, clarified that Enyo’s plans did not include SMRs.

“We’re not proposing nuclear technology; this proposal is about creating a framework for various energy solutions,” she explained.

Eagle Mountain’s proactive stance reflects a broader regional and national push to modernize energy infrastructure. The City’s efforts align with Utah’s Operation Gigawatt initiative, which aims to expand sustainable energy production statewide.

However, Rocky Mountain Power, the region’s primary utility provider, has indicated limited capacity to expand generation in the near term. This reality has prompted Eagle Mountain to explore local generation solutions to support private sector and residential investment looking to locate in the community.

The Eagle Mountain City Council will consider the Planning Commission’s recommendation at its meeting on Jan. 21.

Should the City Council move forward with the proposed amendments, any energy generation projects would still undergo rigorous review processes to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations.

City Communications Manager Tyler Maffitt reassured residents that no projects are currently on the table. “To be clear, the City is not anticipating any projects related to small modular nuclear at this time,” he said. “These amendments are about positioning Eagle Mountain to responsibly accommodate advancements in technology while safeguarding the environment and community well-being.”